![]() This is because companies DO use old non-portable programs on a daily basis, and rebooting into an old version of Windows to run them is a worse option than virtualization.ĭaily postings about the shit people need to deal with in tech workplaces. ![]() Many businesses still deal with ancient programs that won't run on newer versions of Windows, let alone another system (source lost to time, original developer defunct, no porting allowed due to license issues, etc.), which is another reason that XP mode was so heavily pushed in the Pro(+) editions of Windows. The popular applications people think about (major browsers, communication tools like messengers and skype) are actually a very tiny amount of all the programs that are out there.Īnd let me tell you something the majority of programs required in the workplace and school are NOT firefox and skype. ![]() I was on Ubuntu as my main OS for months, and almost all the DS and PSP-centric tools I had were running through WINE. A large amount of popular applications, yes, but not a majority of the total. I don't like the way Apple prices their medium-to-low performing computers just because they have a nice frame around them either, but that's why there is a second-hand market.Ĭlick to expand.Majority is false. It seems to me you just want to be snarky for no good reason. Obviously compatibility is better for Windows programs on Windows, but not everyone is trying to run hard-to-emulate software on non-Windows OS's, so it's faulty to assume that you need to "get an actual computer" to run those things.Īlso, the OP is offering / linking to a free version of a program, and your suggestion is to go buy a copy of Windows instead. time it takes to load emulated / wrapped software.Ĥ) Personal preference of Windows dislike, or favoring a Unix system for whatever reason.Ībove are several reasons one might want something like crossover rather than installing and using a bootcamp partition. price of (legit) Parallels / VMWare, or free Wine for OSX and Linux.ģ) Time it takes to switch OS vs. It's not aimed at the casual user, though, so download with caution and don't expect more out of this than it can currently give-which isn't much.1) Disk space of Windows install vs. The bottom line is that as an advertisement for Wine-showing how it can run Windows apps without a Windows installation underneath them-this is great. Hands-down, that's one of the best things about Chrome. However, ripping a tab off into its own window did work without fail. The browser also sports the default Windows Vista theme, which is hilarious to see on a Mac, but less effective as an aesthetic. There are also problems rendering images and text, with occasional reports of compressed pictures and misaligned type. There's a noticeable lag time, probably about half a second, when typing in text fields or even the Omnibar itself. Type in "nytimes" into the Omnibar and watch Chromium crash. Unfortunately, it's incredibly buggy, and while it proves that Chrome can eventually run on the Mac, CrossOver Chromium is more about demonstrating the utility of Wine for running Windows apps on a non-Windows PC than creating an effective version of Chrome.īased on Version 0.2.149.0 of Chromium, a big part of the problem is stability. The folks at CodeWeavers have successfully built this version of Chromium, Google Chrome's codebase, for non-PowerPC Intel Macs. This is an unstable port of Google Chrome to the Mac via Wine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |